Skip to main content
header-left
File #: 2021-385    Version: 1 Name: V21-094 - 2630 Devin Ct
Type: Variance Request Status: Passed
File created: 9/1/2021 In control: License and Variance Board
On agenda: 9/8/2021 Final action: 9/8/2021
Title: Public Hearing - Variance Request - V21-094 - Allow a second accessory structure - Land Lot 561 - 0.17 acres - 2630 Devin Court - Steve and Corrie Henson
Attachments: 1. Issue Sheet 2021-385 - V21-094 - 2630 Devin Ct.pdf, 2. VarmemoV21-094-096.pdf, 3. Variance Application, 4. Site Plan_2630 Devin Ct, 5. Elevations_2630 Devin Ct, 6. (City Tax), 7. (County Tax), 8. Certified Letter Receipt.pdf
Impact
WARD / COUNCILMEMBER: Ward 3 / Councilmember Lindley

$ IMPACT: N/A

Title
Public Hearing - Variance Request - V21-094 - Allow a second accessory structure - Land Lot 561 - 0.17 acres - 2630 Devin Court - Steve and Corrie Henson

Body
ISSUE AND BACKGROUND:
The applicant is requesting a variance to construct an in-ground pool and an 81 sq. ft. storage shed at 2630 Devin Court. Thus, the applicant requires a variance to allow construction of a pool as an additional accessory structure with the addition of the storage shed. Section 501 controls the maximum allowable number of accessory structures. Additionally, Riley’s Walk originally required certain lots to provide a 10’ and 20’ buffer from existing lots outside of the development. For the pool and shed to be allowed a variance from those buffers will be required

RECOMMENDATION / REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting to deviate from the City’s accessory structure ordinance to allow a second accessory structure and to allow encroachment into a 10’ and 20’ buffer. According to Section 1403 of the Zoning Ordinance, variances must be reviewed under the following standards: (1) Whether there are unique and special or extraordinary circumstances applying to the property; (2) Whether any alleged hardship is self-created by any person having an interest in the property; (3) Whether strict application of the relevant provisions of the code would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of the property; and (4) Whether the variance proposed is the minimum variance needed. Community Development has reviewed the requests against the variance review standards and found them to be in compliance with the review standards. Community Development believes that the requested variance will not adversely affect surrounding residents. Therefore, Community Development recommends approval of the requested variance with the following condition:

1. Approval of the subject property for the requested variance shall ...

Click here for full text