header-left
File #: 2021-011    Version: 1 Name: 1406 Roswell Street - V21-003
Type: Variance Request Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 1/7/2021 In control: License and Variance Board
On agenda: 1/13/2021 Final action: 1/13/2021
Title: Pubic Hearing - V21-003 - Reduction of streetside setback from 23.3 feet to 9 feet - Land Lot 561 - 1406 Roswell Street - Tiffany McAllister
Attachments: 1. Issue Sheet, 2. Varmemo_V21-003-004.pdf, 3. Application_V21-003-004.pdf, 4. Site Plan & Elevations_V21-003-004.pdf
Impact
WARD / COUNCILMEMBER: Ward 3 / Travis Lindley

$ IMPACT: N/A

Title
Pubic Hearing - V21-003 - Reduction of streetside setback from 23.3 feet to 9 feet - Land Lot 561 - 1406 Roswell Street - Tiffany McAllister

Body
ISSUE AND BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the streetside setback from 23.3 feet to 9 feet to allow for the construction of an enclosed garage on a single-family residence at 1406 Roswell Street. The applicant is also requesting a variance to allow for a 5.6-foot wooden fence in the front yard. The development standards established by the City for the R-15 zoning district require a minimum streetside setback of 23.3 feet. Section 503-A controls the location and height of fences in the Zoning Code.

RECOMMENDATION / REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting to deviate from the development standards established by the City for the R-15 zoning district which requires a minimum streetside setback of 23.3 feet and Section 503-A, which requires a four-foot fence in the front yard. According to Section 1403 of the Zoning Ordinance, variances must be reviewed under the following standards: (1) Whether there are unique and special or extraordinary circumstances applying to the property; (2) Whether any alleged hardship is self-created by any person having an interest in the property; (3) Whether strict application of the relevant provisions of the code would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of the property; and (4) Whether the variance proposed is the minimum variance needed. Community Development has reviewed the request against the variance review standards and found it to be in compliance with four (4) of the four (4) standards. Similar variances have been approved throughout the city so no negative precedent would be set. At the time of this report, Community Development has not received any phone calls regarding the variance request. After a review of the standards above, Community Development believes...

Click here for full text