Skip to main content
header-left
File #: V14-007    Version: 1 Name: V14-007
Type: Variance Request Status: Passed
File created: 4/4/2014 In control: License and Variance Board
On agenda: 4/9/2014 Final action: 4/9/2014
Title: Public Hearing - Variance Request - V14-007 - Allow reduction of side setback from 10 feet to 0 feet for the construction of a carport - 0.42 acres - Land Lot 778 - 2535 Rolling View Drive - Nina Medina
Attachments: 1. IssueSheetV14-007, 2. Varmemo14-007, 3. Site Plan, 4. Variance Application
Impact

WARD:  1

COMMITTEE:  Community Development

$ IMPACT:  N/A

Title

Public Hearing - Variance Request - V14-007 - Allow reduction of side setback from 10 feet to 0 feet for the construction of a carport - 0.42 acres - Land Lot 778 - 2535 Rolling View Drive - Nina Medina

Body

ISSUE: The applicant is requesting a variance for a reduction of the side setback from 10 feet to 0 feet at 2535 Rolling View Drive for the construction of a carport.

BACKGROUND:  None.

RECOMMENDATION/REQUESTED ACTION:  The applicant is requesting to deviate from the development standards established by the City for the R-15 zoning district, which requires a minimum side yard setback of 10 feet.  The applicant is requesting a reduction of the side setback for 2535 Rolling View Drive to 0 feet for the construction of carport on a single-family home.  According to Section 1403 of the Zoning Ordinance, variances must be reviewed under the following standards: (1) Whether there are unique and special or extraordinary circumstances applying to the property; (2) Whether any alleged hardship is self-created by any person having an interest in the property; (3) Whether strict application of the relevant provisions of the code would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of the property; and (4) Whether the variance proposed is the minimum variance needed. Community Development has reviewed the request against the variance review standards and found it to be in compliance with four (4) of the four (4) standards. Similar variances have been approved throughout the city so no negative precedent would be set.  At the time of this report, Community Development has not received any phone calls regarding the variance request. After a review of the standards above, Community Development believes that the encroachment will not adversely affect surrounding residents; therefore, staff recommends approval of the requested variance with the following conditions:

1.      Approval of the ...

Click here for full text