Skip to main content
header-left
File #: V18-013    Version: 1 Name: V18-013 - 462 Cooper Woods Ct
Type: Variance Request Status: Passed
File created: 2/23/2018 In control: License and Variance Board
On agenda: 2/28/2018 Final action: 2/28/2018
Title: Public Hearing - Variance Request - V18-013 - Allow second kitchen in basement of existing single family residence - Land Lot 333 - 0.25 acres - 462 Cooper Woods Court - Valerie George
Attachments: 1. Variance Memo V18-013, 2. APPLICATION
Impact
WARD: 4

COMMITTEE: Community Development

$ IMPACT: N/A

Title
Public Hearing - Variance Request - V18-013 - Allow second kitchen in basement of existing single family residence - Land Lot 333 - 0.25 acres - 462 Cooper Woods Court - Valerie George

Body
ISSUE: The applicant is in the process of completing an addition on an existing single family residence to prepare additional living space for aging parents, and is requesting a variance from Section 402.24 of the Zoning Code to allow a second kitchen. Because the subject property is a single-family residence, the additional kitchen would constitute a second living unit, which is prohibited per the definition of a single-family dwelling.


BACKGROUND: None.

RECOMMENDATION/REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant has requested a variance to permit a second kitchen in a single-family home. According to Section 1403 of the Zoning Ordinance, variances must be reviewed under the following standards: (1) Whether there are unique and special or extraordinary circumstances applying to the property; (2) Whether any alleged hardship is self-created by any person having an interest in the property; (3) Whether strict application of the relevant provisions of the code would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of the property; and (4) Whether the variance proposed is the minimum variance needed. Community Development has reviewed the request against the variance review standards and found it to be in compliance with the four (4) standards. Furthermore, there is a precedent for the variance in the city having approved similar variances in the Heritage at Vinings, Enclave at Cooper Lake and Stonegate subdivisions. These previous variances have been for homes of similar size and type with no known detriment to the surrounding areas. After a review of the standards above, Community Development believes that the second kitchen will not adversely affect surrounding residents, nor set a negative precedent for fut...

Click here for full text