header-left
File #: V17-011    Version: 1 Name: 3600 Lee Street - V17-011
Type: Variance Request Status: Passed
File created: 2/20/2017 In control: License and Variance Board
On agenda: 2/22/2017 Final action: 2/22/2017
Title: Public Hearing - Variance Request - V17-011 - Allow side setback reduction from 10 feet to 4 feet - 0.37 acres - Land Lot 555 - 3600 Lee Street - Peter and Diana Marino
Attachments: 1. Staff Memo - 17-011.pdf, 2. Site Plan.pdf, 3. Application.pdf
Impact
WARD: 6

COMMITTEE: Community Development

$ IMPACT: N/A

Title
Public Hearing - Variance Request - V17-011 - Allow side setback reduction from 10 feet to 4 feet - 0.37 acres - Land Lot 555 - 3600 Lee Street - Peter and Diana Marino


Body
ISSUE: The applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the side yard setback for 3600 Lee Street from 10 feet to 4 feet for a proposed addition to a single-family residence. The development standards established by the City for the R-15 zoning district require a minimum side yard setback of 10 feet.


BACKGROUND: None.

RECOMMENDATION/REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting to deviate from the development standards established by the City for the R-15 zoning district, which requires a minimum side yard setback of 10 feet. The applicant is requesting a reduction of the side setback for 3600 Lee Street to 4 feet for the construction of an addition to a single-family home. According to Section 1403 of the Zoning Ordinance, variances must be reviewed under the following standards: (1) Whether there are unique and special or extraordinary circumstances applying to the property; (2) Whether any alleged hardship is self-created by any person having an interest in the property; (3) Whether strict application of the relevant provisions of the code would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of the property; and (4) Whether the variance proposed is the minimum variance needed. Community Development has reviewed the request against the variance review standards and found it to be in compliance with four (4) of the four (4) standards. Similar variances have been approved throughout the city so no negative precedent would be set. At the time of this report, Community Development has not received any phone calls regarding the variance request. After a review of the standards above, Community Development believes that the encroachment will not adversely affect surrounding residents; therefore, staff recommends ap...

Click here for full text