header-left
File #: V18-026    Version: Name: V18-026 - 3336 Creatwood Trl
Type: Variance Request Status: Passed
File created: 3/23/2018 In control: License and Variance Board
On agenda: 4/25/2018 Final action: 4/25/2018
Title: Public Hearing - Variance Request - V18-026 - Allow front setback reduction from 35 feet to 16 feet for the construction of a new single family home - 0.25 acres - Land Lot 628 - 3336 Creatwood Trail - Rachel and Greg McCullough
Impact
WARD: 6

COMMITTEE: Community Development

$ IMPACT: N/A

Title
Public Hearing - Variance Request - V18-026 - Allow front setback reduction from 35 feet to 16 feet for the construction of a new single family home - 0.25 acres - Land Lot 628 - 3336 Creatwood Trail - Rachel and Greg McCullough
Body
ISSUE: The applicant is requesting three variances, allowing encroachment into the City’s 50 ft. undisturbed buffer and the City’s 75 ft. impervious surface setback, as well as a front setback reduction from 35 feet to 16 feet for the construction of a new single family home. Stream buffers are controlled by Chapter 6, Article VI, and setbacks are established in section 801 of the Zoning Code. This request is associated with V18-025-028.


BACKGROUND: None.

RECOMMENDATION/REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting relief from the city’s 50 ft. undisturbed buffer, 75 ft. impervious surface setback, and 35 ft. front setback to build a new single family home on the undeveloped lot of record. The applicant requests encroachment into the city 50 ft. undisturbed buffer and 75 ft. impervious setback, and to reduce the front setback to 16 feet. According to Section 1403 of the Zoning Ordinance, variances must be reviewed under the following standards: (1) Whether there are unique and special or extraordinary circumstances applying to the property; (2) Whether any alleged hardship is self-created by any person having an interest in the property; (3) Whether strict application of the relevant provisions of the code would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of the property; and (4) Whether the variance proposed is the minimum variance needed. Community Development has reviewed the request against the variance review standards and found it to be in compliance with four (4) of the four (4) standards. At the time of this report, Community Development has not received any calls in opposition to the request. After a review of the standards above, Community Devel...

Click here for full text