header-left
File #: V18-031    Version: 1 Name: V18-031 - 2821 Fraser St
Type: Variance Request Status: Passed
File created: 4/6/2018 In control: License and Variance Board
On agenda: 4/11/2018 Final action: 4/11/2018
Title: Public Hearing - Variance Request - V18-031 - Allow second story on existing single family home with non-conforming front and side setbacks - Land Lot 449 - 0.23 acres - 2821 Fraser Street - Brian Denis
Attachments: 1. Varmemo - V18-031, 2. Site Plan, 3. House Plan, 4. Application
Impact
WARD: 3

COMMITTEE: Community Development

$ IMPACT: N/A

Title
Public Hearing - Variance Request - V18-031 - Allow second story on existing single family home with non-conforming front and side setbacks - Land Lot 449 - 0.23 acres - 2821 Fraser Street - Brian Denis



Body
ISSUE: The applicant is requesting a variance to build a second story on an existing home with non-conforming front and side setbacks. The current structure is one story with a front setback of 30 feet on Fraser, 15 feet on Bank Street, and north side setback of 5 feet. Section 801 of the zoning ordinance requires a front setback of 35 feet on Fraser, 23.1 on Bank Street, and side setback of 10 feet.


BACKGROUND: None.

RECOMMENDATION/REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting to deviate from the development standards established by the City for the R-15 zoning district, which requires a minimum front yard setback of 35 feet on Fraser Street, 23.1 feet on Bank Street, and a north side setback of 10 feet. The applicant requests a variance to build a second story on the existing non-conforming setbacks at 2821 Fraser Street. According to Section 1403 of the Zoning Ordinance, variances must be reviewed under the following standards: (1) Whether there are unique and special or extraordinary circumstances applying to the property; (2) Whether any alleged hardship is self-created by any person having an interest in the property; (3) Whether strict application of the relevant provisions of the code would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of the property; and (4) Whether the variance proposed is the minimum variance needed. Community Development has reviewed the request against the variance review standards and found it to be in compliance with four (4) of the four (4) standards. At the time of this report, Community Development has not received any phone calls regarding the variance request. After a review of the standards above, Community Development believes that the e...

Click here for full text