header-left
File #: 2021-448    Version: 1 Name: Variance Request - V21-053-B - 1355 Marston St
Type: Variance Request Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 10/6/2021 In control: License and Variance Board
On agenda: 10/13/2021 Final action: 10/13/2021
Title: Public Hearing - Variance Request - V21-053-B - Allow second accessory structure - Land Lot 561 - 1355 Marston Street - Kenya Brock & Yvonne Lloyd
Attachments: 1. Varmemo_V21-053.pdf, 2. Application_V21-053.pdf, 3. Site Plan V4.pdf
Impact
WARD / COUNCILMEMBER: Ward 3 / Councilmember Lindley

$ IMPACT: N/A

Title
Public Hearing - Variance Request - V21-053-B - Allow second accessory structure - Land Lot 561 - 1355 Marston Street - Kenya Brock & Yvonne Lloyd


Body
ISSUE AND BACKGROUND:
The applicant is seeking variances to allow for an increase in the impervious surface area from 35% to 48.7% and to allow for a second accessory structure to construct an inground pool at 1355 Marston Street. Section 801 sets the maximum impervious area in the R-15 zoning district whereas Section 501 controls the maximum allowable number of accessory structures.


RECOMMENDATION / REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting to deviate from the development standards established by the City for the R-15 zoning district, which requires a maximum impervious area of 35%. The applicant is requesting to increase the impervious surface area to 48.7% to allow for the construction of an inground swimming pool. According to Section 1403 of the Zoning Ordinance, variances must be reviewed under the following standards: (1) Whether there are unique and special or extraordinary circumstances applying to the property; (2) Whether any alleged hardship is self-created by any person having an interest in the property; (3) Whether strict application of the relevant provisions of the code would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of the property; and (4) Whether the variance proposed is the minimum variance needed. Community Development has reviewed the request against the variance review standards and found it to be in compliance with four (4) of the four (4) standards. After a review of the standards above, Community Development believes that the impervious surface increase will not adversely affect surrounding residents; therefore, staff recommends approval of the requested variance with the following condition:

1. Approval is conditioned upon substantial compliance with the site plan submitted with the varianc...

Click here for full text